Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Do you think it is good idea?
There is no shortage of the opinion on pros and cons of performing divergent tasks while working. In my opinion, accomplishing similar performance throughout the day is more beneficial than attempting to do another things. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, when individuals perform a main task at the job, they will be available to concentrate on the thing comprehensively because they do not have to scatter their focus to the many problems. Therefore, people will complete their job sooner and successfully. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is heavily influenced by my own experience. The last year, I was working at the library, which required me to achieve various things. Later, I started failing things because I could not focus on things adequately. Afterwards, I changed the position with the adviser of library, and started communicating customers mainly. Fortunately, I scarcely made mistakes ,once I altered the my tasks by making it less scattered, because I could pay consummate attention to my task. Drawing from my own experience, workers will get capable of circumventing risks by concentrating exclusively on the main matter.
Secondly, people should perform the thing on which they specialized rather than branching out all the time so that their productivity will be improved. When individuals accomplish the thing they know well, they will finish it cleverly because they know how to achieve it. My personal experience is compelling example of this. Last year, I was working as mathematics tutor in the studying center, and my every pupils was satisfied with my teaching. Afterwards, executive of the organization required me to teach students physics and English , at which I am not as good as mathematics. Because I had not any experience of teaching these further lesson, I could not teach very will. Eventually, my new pupils started reprimanding me for giving unsatisfactory lesson. In consequence, when people would attempt to perform divergent matters, they would be required to accomplish things they scarcely do, which will lead to unacceptable results.
To sum up, I am of the opinion of the carrying out a main job will probably help individuals to circumvent from problems. This is because they will concentrate on the tasks and do the thing at which they specialized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y. Fortunately, I scarcely made mistakes ,once I altered the my tasks by making it...
^^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'my'?
Suggestion: the; my
... scarcely made mistakes ,once I altered the my tasks by making it less scattered, beca...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...me to teach students physics and English , at which I am not as good as mathematic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, another thing, i feel, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16452442159 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0790174496 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516709511568 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8868331409 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5238095238 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225195418657 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063789547641 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850267191254 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150942959037 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00546370077447 0.0645574589148 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.