Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, nowadays in every company, employees play a paramount role in achieving the organization’s goals. Most of the staff are aware of the rights that should be given to them in the organization, therefore, in any system, Chief Executive Officer and middle-level managers, in particular, should do their best to satisfy workers in all dimensions including working elements. In this regard, some people believe it is the best idea that employees could be more pleased when they have diverse areas of work but others beg to differ and claim that having the same duties in working hours is better for staff. Personally, I subscribe to the former idea and feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, it is worth considering that accomplishing various duties in working time can activate the latent talents of employees in the field of their responsibilities, so in this case, staff believes in the potentials they have.in other words, because these potentials are applied to fulfill the goals of the organization, it causes not only managers to be satisfied with these staff. But also the employees feel intrinsic contentment of themselves, which undoubtedly increases their self-confidence over time. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I used to work in a hospital. One day my boss called me and mentioned that he had added new job descriptions to the previous ones. I became delighted but stressed because I taught maybe I’m not able to cope with it. However, after a while, I realized that I was great at these recent tasks so, every day I made an effort to perform it better. As a result, I attained both my boss’s satisfaction and my high self-esteem in parallel. (Concurrently)
Secondly, let me take a look at this concept that taking new tasks can prevent job burnout in the workplace. One aspect of the advent of burnout is that employees experience psychological problems over time. Otherwise, it can be asserted that doing a repetitive job for a long time might have many destructive impacts on staff. This is because they focus on a specific duty every day so if this happens frequently can withdraw creativeness and inventiveness. Therefore, they are not satisfied with the process themselves, nor are managers. For instance, about 5 years ago, researchers conducted a study about this issue among 4000 workers in different companies who were surveyed for three years. They had found that employees who performed a variety of tasks during the workday, were significantly protected from job burnout than employees who repeated a single work. In addition, they noticed these workers take advantage of doing diverse duties and enjoy better mental health than others.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that carry out dissimilar tasks for employees is a fantastic idea. This not only realizes the potentials of the staff in order to progress toward the completing organization’s goals but also inhibits the career burnout among workers which have many benefits for both employees and the system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 907, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...very day I made an effort to perform it better. As a result, I attained both my boss’s...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...njoy better mental health than others. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, by and large, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94499099046 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.3583616405 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.272727273 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220513979415 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555482352186 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451899397953 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123832692654 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558307643736 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.