summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about how glasses of a building could be dangerous for wild birds? The reading states that birds cannot distinguish between air and glass so they crash with glass and harm. The author of reading feels that there are some solutions in designing buildings with glasses to prevent hurting birds. However, the lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that these solutions are not efficient and providing three strong reasons.
To begin with, the author argues that we can replace regular glass with one-way glass which is transparent only on one side so the birds can realize that it is just a barrier and not try to fly into it. On the other hand, the professor states this kind of glass reflex everything like a mirror. As birds don’t understand the mirror, if they see a reflection of the sky or a tree on glass, they try to fly through it. Consequently this sort of glass as bad as the regular ones.
Secondly, in the article, it is asserted that another solution is that architectures can use colorful lines on glasses for designing buildings. So once the birds see these lines they avoid trying to fly through them while people can watch outside through windows where there is no painting. In contrast, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that birds see those non-colorful segments of windows as open holes, so they try to fly through them. Besides these windows make the room dark for a person.
Finally, the reading points out that another solution is to create a magnetic field around the buildings to guide birds away. Moreover, the author notes that birds have an ability that can help them navigate in the right direction. However, the lecturer maintains an opposite opinion and mentions that even though birds have this ability, they just use it for flying very long distances. For example, they use it when they want to migrate from a cold region to a warm one before winter, otherwise they find their path with the help of their eyes and the sense of light’s brightness for short trips.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lass so they crash with glass and harm. The author of reading feels that there are ...
^^^
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...e on glass, they try to fly through it. Consequently this sort of glass as bad as the regula...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nes on glasses for designing buildings. So once the birds see these lines they avoid tr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in contrast, kind of, sort of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74033149171 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38275321769 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527624309392 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5640561658 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.941176471 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11999972088 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043855590723 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496711737051 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759959973198 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502842848579 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.