Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, nowadays because of increased life’s expenses, people spending most of the day on performing a job and it’s becoming a significant portion of their life, therefore, it is crucial for them to work in a manner that is delightful for them. In this regard, some people believe it is the best idea that only work three days a week for long hours but others beg to differ and claim that working five days a week for shorter hours is more pleasant. Personally, I subscribe to the former idea and feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, it is worth considering that obviously working three days a week leads to four days off work which is absolutely wonderful. In other words, been working all day just for three straight days, enhances more opportunities for leisure, physical training, short-term journey, etc, so in this case, people take advantage of both work and life in a row. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I remembered that for a long time I wished I could travel to the countryside of my residential town and visit natural environments. Finally, I find a job in which I could work three whole days of the week. That chance was very awesome for me, so I scheduled my off days to take trips to various sites like historical places, amazing waterfalls, etc. therefore, not only I enjoyed traveling but also I did hobbies like going to the concert, do exercise and something like this in those moments.
Secondly, let me take a look at this concept that working 5 days a week despite fewer hours than regular can leads to psychiatric problems in the long term. To be more specific, when a person spends most of his life carrying out work, most probably take limited time for himself/herself, so day by day the person can be exhausted from the job and after a while find itself frustrated, uninspired and stressed. So, definitely after a while, this person faced mental-health issues which are awful. For instance, about 3 years ago, researchers conducted a study about this issue among 5000 people, those who had a diverse occupation. Researchers divided these people into separate groups. One who had a job like 3 days a week and others who had a job 5 days a week or more. They had found that people in the first group were more satisfied with their job and also mentioned that they enjoy life too. In contrast, people in the second group disagreed, stating that they were just busy and could not devote much time to themselves and this matter affected their personal lives and work.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that working 3 days a week is a fantastic idea. This not only gives more opportunities for leisure activities but also prevents psychological problems like stress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ek despite fewer hours than regular can leads to psychiatric problems in the long ter...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffected their personal lives and work. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, by and large, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69325153374 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68131772604 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515337423313 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4962391954 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.45 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344570439576 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111172724293 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923340182495 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235478617401 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618084798279 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.