Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on
specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about the practices in which wood companies are being certified in order to maintain ecological standard. The author of the reading states that this way they could promote their product and allure more consumers. Nevertheless, American c6mpanies not tended to utilize these practices. The lecturer opposes the idea and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that US companies are connected to numerous advertising and the products are already tagged as better one, they need not to attain certificate. The lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that now customer distinguish between certifies and non certified ones and they confer more importance to certified company as they trust to those who has certification.
Secondly, certified woods are costly and they rather choose to offer goods that are affordable since they believe consumer prompt to purchase wood that are cost effective to them. The speaker on other hand points out that although they care about price they are concerned about the certification. In addition, if there is minimal difference of 5% amid certified and non certified then undoubtedly they would choose the verified ones.
Finally, the reading passage als6 notes that US companies are inclined towards elevating their customers throughout the world making their business established as they reckon it would only make sense if they could make their business worldwide otherwise certification is of no use. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that in order to have strong competition and flourish in foreign market then it is imperative to be certified first.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on US companies not taking this practice seriously. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ertheless, American c6mpanies not tended to utilize these practices. The lecturer...
^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'attain'?
Suggestion: attain
...ady tagged as better one, they need not to attain certificate. The lecturer believes ther...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34666666667 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74987676492 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6857112964 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.933333333 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165334442611 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504475522332 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041035275553 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845602458499 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441900013344 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.