Job satisfaction plays a pivotal role in everyone’s life. There are different standpoints regarding happiness in the workplace. Every industrial firm has its own way of working, and the employees must need to follow their guidance. In this regard, some people would be happy in working on the same task all over the day. However, others hold a different opinion that people would get a chance to acquire a wide horizon of knowledge by performing the different tasks at the job. From my vantage point, the latter view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that as an employee, people are constantly trying to perform best as possible way because being recognized in the firm can enhance their promotional opportunities as well as can improve their lifestyle. Doing different types of task enables the workers to showcase their skills by working in different ways than others which would further motivate them to be creative and push them to serve the best version of them. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I started working as a receptionist in a dental clinic following my graduation, where I used to attend calls from patients all over the day, and gradually, it became tiresome for me. Later on, I got a job as a dental assistant in the same clinic which helped me to serve different functions as an assistant. Hence, performing various activities changed made my life interesting which would have not possible if I had continued working as a receptionist.
Another noteworthy point is that doing a single task results in an unpleasant feeling which might be harmful to the health and demotivating to the employees, whereas several tasks push their mind in a more thoughtful way, and people would try to find the solution of given tasks. Therefore, it creates a stimulating environment for workers whereby they can be proactive and creative, and apparently, it is beneficial for the company. To shed more light on this, my brother is working as a software developer where he is being involved in different activities in order to complete different goals in one day. Last week, because of his multitasking approach, he was able to find a solution in which the company has been stuck for one year. Therefore, being multitasking helped him to be multitalented at the same time.
Moreover, working in a different role would provide an opportunity to meet new people. On the contrary, when people are engaged in the same routine, they would need to work with the same employees which might mitigate their work efficiency. For instance, I remembered when I started working as a dental assistant; I used to handle different departments of the dental clinic which provided me an opportunity to work with different people. Thus, it was fun and exciting to work with different types of people every day in the workplace.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that workers are more satisfied when they have to perform different tasks for the whole day. This is because it will keep them motivated, and because several tasks aid them to develop different types of skill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on account for the following reasons. The first reason that makes me hold the ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d continued working as a receptionist. Another noteworthy point is that doing a...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to be multitalented at the same time. Moreover, working in a different role wo...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of people every day in the workplace. All in all, contemplating all remarks, I...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2666.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 539.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94619666048 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81029833875 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47680890538 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 826.2 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7234023851 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.083333333 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4583333333 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225063796867 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627042124044 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737508845992 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14837424998 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807265627856 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.