Every individual has their own way of working style according to their choices and comforts. On that ground, their ability and working style can clearly affect the work environment where they are working. In this regard, some people think that coworkers who have gratitude to adopt new things would be the best option to work with them. On the contrary, others hold a different opinion that it is much easier to work with those who can spread happiness or maybe someone serious about their goals. From my vantage point, the former view contains more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first thing that makes me hold my belief that coworkers who are proactive and have walked with a positive attitude can enhance the stimulating work environment. Moreover, whenever they take part in group projects or assignments, it would be easier for other group members to work with such personality people. On the other hand, people who are aimless and do not want to adopt new things are lazy people, and they always pass their responsibilities to others. In fact, it is hard to work with these types of personalities at the workplace. For instance, a recent survey from the University of California states that nowadays, companies are hiring employees who are passionate to tackle new experiments in their life. By and large, it is crucial to have some employees with such attitudes in the firm in order to gain profit.
Another noteworthy point is that in the last few decades, as time marches on, it has become difficult to sustain at one position in the same company. Therefore, people need to upgrade themselves in order to stick at the same workplace or gain a high position. Moreover, people who like to grasp new things are mutually fruitful to the whole company as well as for themselves. This is because even if the company is stuck at some problems, these types of employees always find certain solutions due to their inherited nature towards their work ethics. Drawing from my own example, last year, my firm hired a new employee who had more than 20yrs of work experience. while at first glance he seemed like a perfect addition to the organization, his techniques were totally out dates with the modern world. ON top of that he neither wanted to learn nor implement new theories in his working experience. Beyond and large, eventually, he was dismissed from the firm because his negative attitude affected the whole company.
All in all, I strongly believe that a willingness to learn new things is the hallmark of a good employee. This is because such people spread carry with a positive outlook which would be helpful to others in the firm and today's changing world it is necessary to learn new skills and techniques.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 666, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...had more than 20yrs of work experience. while at first glance he seemed like a perfec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as for, for instance, in fact, as well as, by and large, on the contrary, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8689217759 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58544648377 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517970401691 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.560680301 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.681818182 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.59090909091 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223591178005 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674839983163 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521448977746 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14493036672 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745256918898 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.