Throughout history, politics have played a pivotal role in the development of mankind. On that ground, there are various ways through which people get connected with politics. In this regard, some people contend that human beings especially school-going students are more enthusiastic about politics nowadays than past. On the other side, there is a group of people who believe that nowadays students are really busy studying their course curriculum and therefore, they do not want to get involved in politics. Certainly, from my vantage point, the former view contains more weight. For the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my stance.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that irrefutably, the rapid technological advancement especially in the field of information and communication, technology paved the way for students to have speedy access to political development in the world. To be more specific, students can acquire a wide variety of political news through various platforms such as television, internet, radio, and etc which motivates them to actively keep eye on big events happening at home and worldwide. Nonetheless, in the past, students were not equipped with high-tech gadgets whereby they could get political news. As for an example, my father once shared his life experience, telling me, he rarely cared about political issues in his school days. In fact, he was considering his education as a prime focus, and getting a good score was the only motive in his life. On the contrary, I, as a contemporary student, find myself always viewing political events such as recent political meeting content or chairman’s speech on a website through Facebook or Twitter. Ultimately, it is judicious to say that modern students are more active about political events going on in the whole world.
Another noteworthy reason is that no one can deny the fact that the education system has been drastically changed compared to the previous time in which students not only obtain academic education but also gain political knowledge through their academic careers. On top of that, modern parents are well aware of political episodes going on around them which they can deliver to their children. For instance, as I mentioned earlier, when my father was young, neither his school nor his parents ever encouraged him to study political events. In contrast, in the current days, students must have to attend a separate political science class in which they get to know about different political views from different students, and also, get the chance to take part in debate competitions about it. Admittedly, it is reasonable to say that current students have enough knowledge of politics.
All in all, from contemplating all remarks, although some people may not agree with my viewpoint, I personally believe that students get involved in politics more often nowadays. This is because they have easy access to fetching information about what is happening around them, and the education system provides additional support to them in order to get up-to-date information for politics.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, for instance, in contrast, in fact, such as, on the contrary, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2663.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29423459245 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80703456049 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544731610338 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.708877062 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.15 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.15 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245466692668 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756448428903 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587213658936 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151857776657 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385668047528 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.