During our careers, we work with many different kinds of people. All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits. In your opinion, which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker?
a serious attitude regarding their work obligations
a willingness to learn new things
the ability to make other people laugh
You may choose more than one of these options. Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. Do not use memorized examples.
Having fine co-workers can heavily influence people’s working condition and attitude towards their job. Personally, I believe that the most important aspects of appropriate working partners are the serious behavior towards the job, and the satisfactory sense of humor. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, co-workers who have important thought about their work ordinance can be inspiring, so other workers will probably learn from them. Thereby, a number of people who follow the obligation increases, which leads to larger productivity than they were doing before. Moreover, if the most workers of the institution are following the ordinance well, the conflict between supervisor and workers will diminish because there is no stimulus of friction. Thus, the communication between workers will be adequate, which leads to the comfortable and calm condition of the office.
Secondly, people with the adequate sense of humor can establish an overjoyed situation on the workplace, which is conducive for individuals working there. Needless to say, everybody loves to laugh in every circumstance, especially in the office where many stressors exist. Hence, people start being motivated to accomplish their task because their stress and other problems will be relieved thanks to the jocular conversation of funny working partners. Many scholars posed that productivity of companies significantly improve when people working in these organizations are happy. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Last year, I began working at the company where the matters I must achieve were quite enormous. Hence, I started being depressed by virtue of the workload. However, I had funny companion at my office, which is the reason why I completely forget my stress. If he had not been here with me, I would have suffered from emotional disorder.
In summation, I am of the opinion of that people who perfectly follow the ordinance of work and funny individuals are important at the work place. This is people follow the rules well can be inspiring to other workers. Moreover, people with a fine sense of the humor can increase the emotional situation of other workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, co-workers who have impor...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...table and calm condition of the office. Secondly, people with the adequate sense...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 973, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have suffered from emotional disorder. In summation, I am of the opinion of tha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, i feel, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32773109244 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8393580601 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8008039175 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.105263158 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245421491911 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072919300452 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551025225215 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154249647224 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175247281615 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.