TPO 28
The reading and lecture are about whether Robert reached the North Pole withing thirty seven days or not. The reading provides three explanations that prove he reached the north pole. The lecturer is the opinion of these explanations cannot be solid evidence about the case.
To begin with, the author states that analyze on Robert's records and tools demonstrated that he reached the north pole. This specific argument is refuted by the lecturer. She mentions that the examination may be subjective because member of investigation team were the explorer's companions. Moreover, the inspecting process lasted for only two days and did not dissect the equipment cautiously, which means that examination can not be objective.
Secondly, in the reading, it is remarked that Tom Avery, explorer, reached the north pole in a time less than thirty seven days by using same sledge which Robert used although average speed is even faster than modern snowmobiles. Nonetheless, the lecturer posits that they traveled in different ways including storing food and traveling situation. She claims that Tom was storing more food and traveling under more pleasant condition,which proves that their travel should not be compared whereas they used same vehicles.
Finally, the author of the reading posits that angle of shadow in a photograph that Robert took was measured, then it was proved that he reached the north pole because there was no discrepancy between the sun's position of the picture and the north pole. The lecturer, nevertheless refutes this by providing further explanation that assessment is unreliable because quality of image was not enough. She mentions that photograph was taken with outdated camera and was blurred, so the measurement on the picture is undependable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s that prove he reached the north pole. The lecturer is the opinion of these explan...
^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
... traveling under more pleasant condition,which proves that their travel should not be ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33451957295 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72856979886 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7497804702 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291915842475 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103788621862 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918060639655 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17498325121 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317859589475 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.