Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The issue at the hand is that workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. I agree with this statement and think several tasks to do are more efficient than one single regular task. In the following, I will pinpoint some outstanding reasons that support my idea.
First of all, due to the rapidly increasing pace of modern society, most people prefer to multitask person rather than one direction-oriented person. When they attain to do several tasks they can learn new techniques and skills that they have never learned if they didn't do before. It ensures that they can use these opportunities in the future of their professional career. For example, students have learning engines that support them to learn quickly and easily new skills, so they can use those experiments on their resume and portfolio and increase the likelihood of getting a professional job in the future. Consider my brother, he spend 12 years of his life working in various jobs and each of them had a great impact on his current role as a business manager, He worked in a bakery, after that, worked on manufactury of producing bread, and after that he works on the big company as a businessman which charges of trading the bread.
The second reason is that multitasking has the ability to ensure people become masters on their own. They can learn some soft skills and hard skills together. Altho, hard-working has to stress and no time to relax people, it contains features that improve people's ability to handle hard situations.
To the short long story, while I believe that there are some difficulties for the workers to do so, I agree with the notion that Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ls that they have never learned if they didnt do before. It ensures that they can use...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 638, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
... in the future. Consider my brother, he spend 12 years of his life working in various...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to do so, I agree with the notion that Workers are more satisfied when they hav...
^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, as to, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57215019921 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.688752314 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483848506296 0.236089414692 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174250306923 0.076458572812 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.222527833783 0.0737576698707 302% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334960942729 0.150856017488 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.232661960077 0.0645574589148 360% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.