workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long
Currently, society has witnessed unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, thus city dwellers are attaching more importance to challenges existing in their jobs, instead of their salaries or other working conditions. A myriad of individuals contend that they have the preference for doing similar tasks all day long since it does not make them suffer from pressure generated from the excessive workload, while others harbor the idea that multiple types of tasks to do during workday make them feel more satisfied with their jobs. Personally speaking, I concur with the latter opinion and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, tackling different tasks is conducive to our job promotion and achievement. When we enter the employment market, what we possess is merely the theoretical knowledge imparted from professors, however, this kind of knowledge can not be applied to deal with real problems directly since real problems are always inextricably intertwined with diversified emergence or other factors. Therefore, the mere approach to improving our aptitude of handling different situations is accumulating pragmatic experience from handling different types of tasks, which constitutes a stepping stone in our job promotion and achievements. The more kinds of tasks we handle, the more experience we amass. Gradually, we are entitled to address varieties of challenges confronted with us based on the gradually enhanced experience. Hence, not only the leaders are inclined to render us with opportunities for a job promotion, but also we are afforded more chances to experience other decent and well-paid job positions. For instance, two of my colleagues, Rebecca and Susan, entered our company at the same time. After they were employed by our company, Rebecca has spared no effort to seize each working opportunities without any hesitation, including the affairs related with diversified domains, like marketing, advertisements and so on, which contributes to the improvement of her personal ability. In contrast, Susan has been dealing with the same affairs, like making preparation for coming meetings. After two years, both of them were evaluated by the leaders in their department. Eventually, Rebecca got promoted, while Susan i
What's more, dealing with different types of tasks also affords us with a sense of achievement. Every time we handle the problems successfully, we are proud of the achievement we attain and feel more pleased with our own capability. The research conducted to evaluate individuals willingness demonstrates that 78% individuals reckon that although it is back-breaking to handle varieties of tasks in different domains, they do obtain numerous rewards from the process, not only the material awards rendered by companies but also the spiritual reward. Most of them feel satisfied with their jobs due to the sense of achievement and they regard this spiritual award as the dominant factor they continue to work hard to make a contribution to their companies.
Admittedly, doing synonymous tasks all day long takes less time and energy, however, it is tedious for individuals to deal with the same affairs without any hope. Meanwhile, what they can attain from jobs is really limited.
In a nutshell, from what has been mentioned above, workers are more satisfies with jobs full of different types of tasks. For one thing, it enables them to sharpen their pragmatic skills. For another, it renders them with the sense of achievement which nurtures their tenacity to keep working.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...y, Rebecca got promoted, while Susan i Whats more, dealing with different types of t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bution to their companies. Admittedly, doing synonymous tasks all day long take...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in contrast, kind of, for one thing, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2991.0 1977.66487455 151% => OK
No of words: 554.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39891696751 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94813974823 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519855595668 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 925.2 618.680645161 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.978512108 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.954545455 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237077020579 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652563394882 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818364256999 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153350127124 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676573517544 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 169.0 86.8835125448 195% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.