Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office?
Working place has significant influence on a person’s feeling and performance. Everyone should come up with an acceptable working place depending on their habit, past experience and other personal information. Based on my experience, I don’t think I should work in office in order to maximize my productivity. Instead, I think working at home is an important way to higher my working performance.
First of all, preventing long distance commuting is one of the best advantages. During a day, everyone has limited energy. Avoiding long distance traveling to company will earn more time to resting working or anything that can encourage one productivity. For example, 3 days of every week I have to do research at school. In those commuting day, I spend considerable energy and 2 hours on public transportation which consume my researching time. Without such heavy loading of commuting, my research will make a substantial process.
Next, following one’s own working pace is an indispensable part of motivated working. In company, following company’s rules is the first priority rather than most suitable working pace. The satisfying and motivating working moment is usually brought by working at home. Depending on my experience, working at home can adjust every factors such as temperature, air, indoor-flowers, and other environmental settings which all have effects on working performance to some degree.
To sum up, working at home not only can stimulate productivity but also provide satisfying atmosphere and environment. If someone pursues the better working experience, working at home is one and the only option.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Working place has significant influence ...
^^
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...working place depending on their habit, past experience and other personal information. Based o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...way to higher my working performance. First of all, preventing long distance c...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arch will make a substantial process. Next, following one's own working p...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing at home. Depending on my experience, working at home can adjust every factors...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n working performance to some degree. To sum up, working at home not only can ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, for example, i think, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 254.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49606299213 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23297152852 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622047244094 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4065120246 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.25 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378929310219 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133620421515 0.076458572812 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12245539262 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249695003105 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120019833288 0.0645574589148 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.