You are going to have a new roommate next semester. Which of the following qualities is most important to you: a) cleanliness b) humorous c) politeness?
The very first day of my work started with well-timed joke on my co-workers. From that moment everything seemed easy and everyone seems like close friend. In that situation, humorous helped to get through hard weird times. Therefore, more than politeness and cleanliness, in answering this question I would definitely choose politeness as the most important quality for new roommate. I have two reason why I prefer humorous is the most essential consideration I look for.
First of all, of course it is fun to be with humorous person. Somehow, the word “humor” connect to belly laugh and quiet sarcastic smile. Both will let us forget about stresses and worries. Lonely times will definitely decrease if there is funny lady behind me. Therefore, it is beneficial for our daily life. For example, imagining living with weakly polite person and crazy funny person, there is imagination occurred automatically in our brain that sadness and joy. Definitely, joy is needful than sadness; hence, I would consider humorous person as happiness bringer and stress reliever.
Secondly, as I mentioned before, little jokes can break the ices so that adaptation in new environment will become easier by communicating no shy. Sometimes, it takes a lot of time to get to know someone stranger and until that time occurs, they is fat-fetched communication occurs, like an strangers who just met. For example, during summer vacation I spend time in campus with three different girls from three different countries. One of them was shy, inner person and another one was out-talker who always makes jokes and vanishes weird situation. After all, than humorous girl and I become close friends in just one week but I was still struggling to understand shy girl. For this situation, humorous helped to communicate better. Hence, to understand each other better and communicate, I would prefer the quality that breaks the ice.
In conclusion, whenever, I got a choice between these three statement, I would hundred percent choose humorous for above reasons and experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...ranger and until that time occurs, they is fat-fetched communication occurs, like ...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... fat-fetched communication occurs, like an strangers who just met. For example, du...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an stranger' or simply 'strangers'?
Suggestion: an stranger; strangers
... fat-fetched communication occurs, like an strangers who just met. For example, during summe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...nd vanishes weird situation. After all, than humorous girl and I become close friend...
^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... between these three statement, I would hundred percent choose humorous for above reaso...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, after all, for example, in conclusion, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21921921922 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84632729259 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627627627628 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1372193533 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.65 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11092066589 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333320564901 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460728905564 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704792576112 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554071694213 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.