You are planning to donate money to a charity and want it to have a major impact on people. Should you donate to a small local group or to a large international organization?
Donation funds to non-profit organizations are an integral part of people's life that become mandatory for human beings. While some people prefer to donate money to huge multinational companies, I choose to use the money to a charity to a small local group that could be used for practical purposes. This option allows me to understand how these local associations will use money. Moreover, I can directly see my contribution to a neighborhood and influence the small company's philanthropy policy.
Clearly, it is important to donate money to a small local group and not avoid it because these organizations care about the local society. For example, Hopelink is a charity organization in the state of Washington. A group of altruists from Redmond, Bellevue, and Kirkland founded this company. I dare say that their social work helps improve the East Side of Seattle with many projects, such as employment services for the homeless and orphans, food banks, and shelters for vulnerable groups of people.
At the same token, it is essential to control a tiny local group how they manage funds and use all opportunities to support people from their community. A striking example is the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the United States, where you can have access to all tax returns from each non-profit organization with all details of how they used their budget. Nevertheless, it would be unwise to deny that the best practice is to use only 15 percent on salary and bonuses to employees. On the IRS website that opens for citizens, people could control this fact.
Alternatively, tremendous international non-for-profit organizations are an excellent example of generosity in a charity, and we should not avoid this option. No doubt, these companies could use money effectively, not only for the local community but also for the whole world. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is an excellent example of a large company that does not reject vital programs. This organization uses transparent accounting and has projects worldwide. Along with that, it could be challenging to realize your contribution to their projects' results.
In the final analysis, it appears that it would be better to donate money to a charity to a small local group because it will significantly impact on people. We could recognize many advantages of this decision, such as helping local people with relevant services, providing transparency with the funds, and contributing to regional projects.
- Memorising facts is a superior skill for successful learning Do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart shows the changes in UK citizens travel aims from 1994 to 1998 along with the bar chart providing data on their preferred routes during the same period 89
- While the reading believes that the sea otters are disappearing because of environmental pollution the lecturer thinks that predation is the main reason for the sea otter s decline 68
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 78
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 510, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'realizing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: realizing
...long with that, it could be challenging to realize your contribution to their projects res...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17955112219 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97471219299 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538653366584 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7968207585 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.315789474 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286014570429 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838275296899 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798197125974 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161863684486 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550070589891 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.