You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her?
Nowadays, according to social problems that have negative effects on people, maintaining a friendship is very difficult, because some actions which people they do it are out of their hands, therefore, their works may probably make a bad condition in their lives, specifically in relationships. However, in a precious friendship on both sides should be patient, because some mistakes occasionally cause people to get bad decisions, so these rulings can destroy their lives. In my opinion, should not break a relationship with one mistake. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, each person can mistake in life actually, no one can tell he/she have not any problems or any mistakes. During the life, people should try to learn correct things from their mistakes, because this learning cause we do not repeat them, Moreover, by learning from mistakes we can have stronger relationships. To further illustration, I would like to demonstrate a personal history. Last year I had a party which all my friends were invited to it. I wanted from their which became to the ceremony without their pats, but one of my friends did not listen to me and he did. That night I was very angry about his work, but after days I realized that our friendship is very important, so I talked to him and asked him do not replay this work, so he admitted his mistake and founded that small thing may eradicate relationships. As you can see, I showed to you that in a real friendship be some mistakes, but should not cut off it, because we can build it even better than before. Thus, the best way is not quite.
Secondly, researchers say that an unsteady person cannot good a friend, because he/she have probably nervous problems. This is very bad for everyone because a person that has this anomaly maybe lose his/her friends. It is asserted by researchers that a steady person is able to control his/her behavior. They stated that unstable people may show reactions in kinship that cause opposite side will upset and this event caused people to stop their friendship, but they should know these reactions are unintentional and they do not leave the relationship, because this behavior has irrecoverable effects on these people. In this research, experts have tried to describe that staying in a relationship have more benefit for both of the side than disconnected it.
In conclusion, taking all the reasons and examples into account, I believe that keeping a desirable friendship is better than leaving it. This is because we can modify our relationship and correct their errors, also we can keep up a friendship if we know opposite side has a serious problem because by this behavior probably we can solve his /her problem
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...se some actions which people they do it are out of their hands, therefore, their wo...
^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...n life actually, no one can tell he/she have not any problems or any mistakes. Durin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to correct'
Suggestion: to correct
...ng the life, people should try to learn correct things from their mistakes, because thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...on cannot good a friend, because he/she have probably nervous problems. This is very...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 85.0 43.0788530466 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92903225806 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76562818752 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513978494624 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.8753176363 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.631578947 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4736842105 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166438673658 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488527022067 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380308005569 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945819203552 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587739625902 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.