You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her?
There are some moot points about continuing friendship with a friend who does something that we do not like that. The question of whether it is better to cut our friendship with this kind of person or not has aroused as a subject of controversy among people. When it comes to my position I strongly subscribe to point that we should still continue our friendship with these friends. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that a friendship relationship has many positive and negative aspects which lead to friends enjoy this relation. One of the most significant features of friendship is friends fulfill something that is not a pleasure for another, therefore, it is very common in each relationship which a friend does something that another don’t like that. If anyone wants to cut relation due to this activity then we can not make any friendship. As a case to the point, when I was a student I had a close friend who sometimes uses my personal stuff. I did not like this function but I never tried to disconnect with him because we had great memories of our friendship. As a result, our relationships have lasted for ten years. We have a corporation and work together now. My personal example competently corroborates to the point that it is not logical to cut our friendship owing to a contradict function from our friends.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that doing something which is not a pleasure for us give rise to think about our hobby and enjoyable activity. Maybe our pleasurable things are not rational thus, a good friend is a friend who has contradict idea toward us. To be more specific, friends should be complemented each other. My personal example demonstrates this reality when I was a student in university I had a bad habit which I did my research projects in the deadline consequently, I could not work very well on my projects and got a low grade. One of my close friends did not choose any project corporative with me because he asserted that I did not work on time. This manner led to I decided to cut my friendship with him. After some contemplating about his acting, I realized that his function is beneficial for me and I should modify my way. My personal experience shed some light to the point that sometimes it is better for us to have friends who disagree with us in some position.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that we should not cut off our relationship with friends who do something we don’t like. This kind of friends not only help to ameliorate our manner but also it is not logical to disconnect with a friend due to some contradiction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-01 | 30vil | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-20 | fereshtehRR | 90 | view |
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 71
- What are some important characteristics of a co-worker? 66
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students. It can either improve the quality of the technology (for example computers and printers) that it provides for students. Or it can redesign spaces where students h 73
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to people i 73
- tpo 43 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...oes something that we do not like that. The question of whether it is better to cut our friendship with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... a subject of controversy among people. When it comes to my position I strongly subs...
^^^^
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hing that another don't like that. If anyone wants to cut relation due to thi...
^^
Line 2, column 915, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... logical to cut our friendship owing to a contradict function from our friends. By the same...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'contradicted'.
Suggestion: contradicted
...thus, a good friend is a friend who has contradict idea toward us. To be more specific, fr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, kind of, as a result, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 81.0 43.0788530466 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6762295082 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86139252572 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444672131148 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.553536598 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.727272727 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232026639248 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823564282137 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606327355628 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181091355654 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412741254735 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.