Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.
Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past.
There are some moot points about politics interest between children in today and the past. The question of whether students are more interested in politics today than they were in the past has aroused as the subject of controversy among authorities. Everyone has their own zeitgeist. I strongly subscribe to the viewpoint that today's’ students are more concerned with diplomacy than they were in the past. I have some reasons, two of which will be explicated hereunder.
The first reason worth discussing here is that, due to advancement in technology and introducing vast gadgets such as cell phones, computers and tablets, students are involved with politics very much. They can get access to tremendous sources of information with some clicks in their tablets, therefore, they have more reference for politics than past days. To be more specific, the concerning in politics stems from the availability of the great source of these issues. As a case in the point I vividly remember, when I was a student I had not any knowledge about president of united state because I had not a source to reach this information but 2 days ago I heard from my cousin that it is better for the peace in the world to president trump selected in united state election. I realized that he pursued us election very well in the social networks. My own experience competently corroborates the idea that today's’ children notice everything in the world owing to, access to vast sources of information thus, they interested in politics more than the past.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned is that the freedom and democracy play a pivotal role in the today's’ modern world consequently, due to this notion there is no restriction toward anything such as politics. Apprentices in the school have free discussion course about diplomacy and political events which was banned in the past. My personal example demonstrates this reality, when I was a student there were many limitations toward politics. We had a course about the world revolution and reasons for that but we had not to permit to ask any question about that trivial issue. In contrast, today's’ students have more freedom in these matter in respect to increasing in democracy and changing minds. They participate in political debate and give their own opinion. My personal Example shed some light of the idea that the freedom and the democracy lead to intercourse about politics and boost interested in this field.
In the nutshell, nowadays, students interested in politics and diplomacy more than in the past this concern not only stem from an improvement in technology but also release from freedom and democracy alteration in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...between children in today and the past. The question of whether students are more interested in politic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'asking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'permit' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: asking
...asons for that but we had not to permit to ask any question about that trivial issue. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in contrast, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2277.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81827282718 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468888888889 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6701712541 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.842105263 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6842105263 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240683591231 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087162688778 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890635771912 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175384884553 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750434453662 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.