Nowadays, in order to cultivate more competitive high school students, more and more high schools make an effort to improve their teaching quality. Thus,more better educated teachers are needed to increase the teaching quality of high school. How to improve the teaching quality of teachers becomes an important question. Some people take the view that, there should be a couple of excellent teachers to be the pioneers to receive the trainings from some experts and then lecture other teachers who haven't received the training. However, I reckon that it is better to provide every teacher with same additional learning resources, such as online material which could be learned by themselves.
First and foremost, the program I assume will be a more convenient way for teachers to receive the training. As for as we all know, teacher is always regarded as one of the busiest jobs in our lives. They are suppose to deal with lots of problem that happens between students and have lots of work loan. Thus, it is hard for teachers to squash out a solid time to receive the retraining from experts, because every teacher has different time schedule. It will be better to offer them some additional learning resources which could be learned by themselves during their own free time. It will also help them to arrange their life effectively because of the flexibility of the program.
Second, program two is going to offering every high school teacher the same additional training which also gives them equal chance to improve themselves. In program one, only a small group of excellent teachers can be selected to receive the training. To some extent, it is not fair for other teachers who are not able to learn from experts. People all over the world are looking for fairness. Thus, program one I agreed with not only gives all the teachers equal right to learn, but it also emphasizes the importance of fairness.
Last but not the least, teachers who involve in the second program are supposed to receive more diversified knowledge which will better assist them to make progress. In program two, high school teachers are given with some online materials which contain a really wide range of knowledge. There has been a research made by Colombia university in 2005 which mentions that knowledge included in online teaching materials equal to the knowledge own by millions of experts. Without doubt, program two will offer teacher even more knowledge.
To sum up, in order to cultivate more educated teachers and help the learn on a more effective way, I strongly recommend schools to apply program two.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , more
... to improve their teaching quality. Thus,more better educated teachers are needed to ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...to improve their teaching quality. Thus,more better educated teachers are needed to increas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...rts and then lecture other teachers who havent received the training. However, I recko...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...the busiest jobs in our lives. They are suppose to deal with lots of problem that happe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of problems'.
Suggestion: lots of problems
...ur lives. They are suppose to deal with lots of problem that happens between students and have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ltivate more educated teachers and help the learn on a more effective way, I strongly rec...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, really, second, so, then, thus, as for, i reckon, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98853211009 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49953598084 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467889908257 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9976451408 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294113564013 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101114895524 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667632464514 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176328826958 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778274479061 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.