It seems that training has already become an inseparable part of our life and a well scheduled and effective training can really help people on different levels. With the progress the trainees made, the trainers, likes those teachers from high school, are also looking for some academic training to improve their teaching quality. However, about the ways of training, some believe that giving a group of excellent teachers an additional training who will then teach the rest would be a good way while others insist that all the teachers should receive additional training equally, by using the online materials. As far as I concerned, I would choose the latter.
To begin with, it will take time to select excellent teachers since it is hard to define “excellent”. Though there are some general standards that an outstanding teacher should have, like extreme patience, years of teaching experience, well educational background, people may have some disputes on how to define one. Some would believe patience must outweigh the experience as students today are tired of traditional teaching methods and probably lack of their patience already. On the other hand, a great background like graduating from a prominent college is thought to be the priority. Therefore, the process of selection will be tough and full of disagreements and discussions, and more importantly, time-consuming.
Secondly, excellent teachers may not be able to deliver the message or give the proper training as they were provided before which they may miss some main points or give the wrong ideas due to their inevitable misunderstandings. Being a student, I once was asked to help another student who missed the class with his math problem. Despite of my elaboration and explanation, as well as my detailed note taking, he cannot understand the method I learned anyway. Realizing my incapability of handling this question, he turned to the teacher for help. In about 5 minutes, he came out of the office with a satisfying look and showed me the one step I missed from procedures which I never thought would be quite essential and necessary. This means a simple point that we will not treat seriously and thus omitted easily could sometimes be a crucial and major point to someone else.
Finally, offering training with online resources and giving classes individually can be essentially convenient and effective. It is difficult to assemble a group of teacher at a certain time since every teacher has their own schedule. However, with online materials like key notes, videos, charts and diagrams, which people can easily download any time any where, teachers can learn any time they like without worrying about losing paper materials.Likewise, individual lesson also allow teacher to find their own weakness without concerning about being pulled or pushed by others during the class.Thus teachers can learn more and faster.
In conclusion, training online and giving lessons personally seems to be a better choice for most teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...ich people can easily download any time any where, teachers can learn any time they like ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Likewise
...t worrying about losing paper materials.Likewise, individual lesson also allow teacher t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 598, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...ed or pushed by others during the class.Thus teachers can learn more and faster. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 598, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ed or pushed by others during the class.Thus teachers can learn more and faster. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, finally, however, if, likewise, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2544.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23456790123 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91520728326 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.1356516284 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.894736842 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5789473684 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57894736842 5.45110844103 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216054746033 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063911896947 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534205730626 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11562043573 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512110536203 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.