The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information

The two tables provide sales data of coffee and bananas from Fairtrade in 1999 and 2004, relating to five countries in Europe.

As can be seen from the first table that all five countries had low coffee sales in 1999 but later the data saw an increase in 2004. UK grew up dramatically from 1.5 to 20 millions of euros. The sales in Switzerland doubled from 3 to 6 million euros. The increase of coffee in Belgium was relatively small among the five countries, only from 1 to 1.7 millions. Least growth was created by Denmark and Sweden with the same amount from1.8 to 2 millions and 0.8 to 1 millions, respectively.

According to the second table, Switzerland is no doubt the biggest salesman of bananas compared with other five countries, booming from 15 in 1999 to 47 millions in 2004. UK and Belgium only had a modest rise from 1 to 5.5 millions and 0.6 to 4 millions respectively. On the contrary, it is surprisingly to find that Sweden and Denmark even showed a decline in five years, with 1.8 to 1 millions and 2 to 0.9 millions, respectively.

In conclusion, UK has the best coffee sales while Switzerland’s bananas sells well.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...04. UK grew up dramatically from 1.5 to 20 millions of euros. The sales in Switzerland doubled...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
...countries, only from 1 to 1.7 millions. Least growth was created by Denmark and Swede...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66995073892 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85846750336 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541871921182 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7832842471 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211814366127 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954086019469 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960056399251 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167033087053 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863762199716 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.