The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananasin 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The table number 1 gives data about Fairtrade-labelled coffee sale rates in the years of 1999 and 2004 in millions of euros in the five European countries. second table illustrates banana's sales in these nations in the same years.
Overall, what stands out is that, in the both tables sales of coffee and banana had been increased totally and in some countries they were significant! Interestingly, banana's sale was decreased in two countries in 2004.
As can be seen, in the coffee table, it is evident that, switzerland sold by far the higher amount of coffee in 1999( 3 millions of euros), while sweden sold least amount in comparison with others, with 0.8 millions of euros. coffee sale rate in all nations had been on the rise in 2004 but surprisingly, uk occupied the first place by marketable acceleration accounted for 20 millions of euros, while switzerland fell to the second place with significant gap with uk(just 6 millions). Moreover, the lowest ale rate was again related to sweden, with 1 millions of euros.
Regarding t banana sale rate, it was higher in switzerland like coffee in 1999(15 millions of euros) but the lowest rate was allocated to belgium with 0.6 millions euro in the year of 1999. This sale rate had enhanced for switzerland, uk and belgium in 2004, with 47, 5.5 and 4 millions of euros respectively, whereas it had declined in sweden and Denmark by 0.8 and 1.1 millions respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...f euros in the five European countries. second table illustrates bananas sales in thes...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...far the higher amount of coffee in 1999 3 millions of euros, while sweden sold least amount i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'sold the least'.
Suggestion: sold the least
... 1999 3 millions of euros, while sweden sold least amount in comparison with others, with ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...mount in comparison with others, with 0.8 millions of euros. coffee sale rate in all nations ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Coffee
...ith others, with 0.8 millions of euros. coffee sale rate in all nations had been on th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...y marketable acceleration accounted for 20 millions of euros, while switzerland fell to the se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile switzerland fell to the second place with significant gap with ukjust 6 milli...
^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
... rate was again related to sweden, with 1 millions of euros. Regarding t banana sale rate,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '199915 million'.
Suggestion: 199915 million
...as higher in switzerland like coffee in 199915 millions of euros but the lowest rate was allocated...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...k and belgium in 2004, with 47, 5.5 and 4 millions of euros respectively, whereas it had decl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86008230453 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81275644904 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526748971193 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1870917072 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.625 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.375 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243877723965 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132602305576 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150333402017 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197908499302 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151411648432 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.