Some people believe that it is good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to share freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
As 21 century continues to unfold, many technological and scientific advances have risen which was barely conceivable fifty years ago. Although scientists, especially in developed countries have access to crucial data which can change earth inhabitants lives in various dimensions, many people would argue that it was not necessary to release all research conclusions globally for wide array of compelling reasons. In my view, All people no matter who they are and which religion they have, should have the equal right to know the latest world progressions. In this essay l will outline two views in different aspects.
Vast majority of authorities in the industrial nations believe that there are many fields of research which some of them are closely linked to their own countries such as suicide rates, economic growth index and so forth. On the other hand, some state of the art experiments which are in need of great deal of money and time ought to be exclusive, unless other countries pay for them. By the way of an example, nowadays, some Japanese scientists do not intend to publish tteir latest scientific analyses as articles in the world authentic journals. Moreover, mini statistical studies have shown that some new information which are out of the comprehension of people result in Misunderstanding among religious societies, especially in the underdeveloped countries.
On the other side of the spectrum, Philanthropists Claim that in this shrinking world which frontiers are becoming increasingly blurred, it is more beneficial that all individuals know about changes because many controversial issues have straightforward impacts on them all around the world. Therefore, tackling global problems entail mutual cooperation and commitment of every community ranging from wealthy to developing economys.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, vital informations which can revolutionize people's well being should be published with generosity in order to create better world to live without ang discrimination. Since gone are the days when powerful territories lived peacefully by colonizing weak countries and collected more and more wealth perpetually. so welfare of every society is connected to others and is for the good of all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...x and so forth. On the other hand, some state of the art experiments which are in need of great ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'tteir the latest'.
Suggestion: tteir the latest
...ese scientists do not intend to publish tteir latest scientific analyses as articles in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntific analyses as articles in the world authentic journals. Moreover, mini stati...
^^
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ected more and more wealth perpetually. so welfare of every society is connected t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, such as, by the way, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46327683616 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06802550363 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649717514124 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4158691132 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.769230769 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149133753748 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499574371829 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327644035017 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839931635921 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545365571354 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.