Your teacher assigns a project to you, and you can select the members to work with.
-choose the members who think and work in similar ways
-choose the members who have totally different ideas
Which would you think is more effective to work with?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">People always need to cooperate with others in order to realize a big dream, and group work is a proper approach to learn how to deal with different kinds of people. When it comes to choosing workmates, some students would like to work with similar ones, since it is easier to communicate with, while from my perspective of view, I prefer to work with entirely different members, simply because this way can make us contribute to the project from various aspects and improve our interpersonal ability.
To begin with, a diverse group always promotes members' self-existence and fosters teamwork spirits, since everyone could share his unique viewpoint based on his previous experiences. As saying goes, "Everything we know and we understand is based on our prior knowledge and experience." Thus, we feel we are participating and we can enrich our knowledge diversely at the same time. Let me take one of my personal experiences to illustrate this. Last time, I was asked to finish an essay on artificial intelligence. One of our group members, Oliver, was from the economy department, while others are all from the engineering department. Once other teammates suspected that Oliver just wanted to be a free-rider. What surprised us was that he claimed some profound analysis from the business angle, which was just a perfect supplement to our theological statement, and it turned out to be the highlight of our assignment, so our work eventually got high praise from the professor. Had I not chosen to work with an exotic major, our work would sink in the sea.
What's more, working with different people is an efficient way to enlarge the friend circle, since group work creates an atmosphere to communicate with each other and cooperates closely so as to achieve the common goal. During daily life, we hardly make friends with those holding different ideas, but the group work brings such new friendship possible. Just take how I met Oliver, who becomes my close friend after the summer course, as a good example. Frankly speaking, I had known Oliver much earlier before our friendship was built. What impressed me most was that we were entirely different people. Once in a summer lecture, we were occasionally arranged into the same group. It was till then that we had the first conversation, and I realized that we actually shared so much in common. Had I not participated in that group, we could still be strangers.
Admitting, the members acting in similar ways would save some time on discussing, but it is easier to be distracted as well. Students generally fall asleep quickly or are easily distracted by the twitters, Facebook messages or new posts on Instagram, because their ideas are uniform and they have nothing to dispute. However, things would be quite different when students have various backgrounds. They have to listen to others carefully, take notes quickly and discuss with others fiercely in order to reach an agreement.
Hence, students can benefit a lot from cooperating with different kinds of teammates for everyone can show his strength, be more sociable than ever before, and not be distracted easily in such a group.</span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re all from the engineering department. Once other teammates suspected that Oliver j...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...r, our work would sink in the sea. Whats more, working with different people is ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... with each other and cooperates closely so as to achieve the common goal. During daily l...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, frankly, hence, however, if, so, still, then, thus, well, while, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2703.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11931818182 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02893849486 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3839374007 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.52173913 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9565217391 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207013635043 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561414262614 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665012170231 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122341335696 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553183167502 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.