The issue both the reading and listening focus on is ways to prevent the decline of Torreya but the listening disagrees at three main points.
At the first point, the reading states that reestablishing Torreya in the same location in which it thrived can solve the problem. According to the listening, the microclimate there is not the same as in the part, because of global warming. This makes it become drier and not suitable for Torreya to proliferate.
At the second point, the reading believes that a possible solution is relocating Torreya far from its Florida microclimate. On the contrary, the listening argues that doing such can bring some unpredicted outcome to the new environment. The new tree species moved to another location are likely to spread too quickly, kill off other native species,...
At the third point, the reading mentions that people should preserve Torreya in research centers. However, the listening confirms that Torreya is unable to survive for a long term if they live in research centers because they do not have enough space for a large amount of Torreya, which is a very important condition for Torreya to survive from diseases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...o quickly, kill off other native species,... At the third point, the reading ment...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02577319588 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66225511469 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592783505155 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.285512358 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132063325315 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053116860999 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368690383398 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773183418438 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268103617548 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.