The issue both the reading and listening focus on is the effects of buzzing but the listening disagrees at three main points.
At the first point, the reading states that the buzzers are likely to give out wrong, misleading information about the product because they are being paid. According to the listening, the buzzers are actually the people who used the product and really like it. Hence they are able to tell others the truths and their real experience.
At the second point, the reading believes that the consumers will listen and receive information about the product less critically than they should because they have no idea that they are talking to a buzzer. On the contrary, the listening argues that the consumers still find out about the product carefully and ask a lot of questions about it. They will not buy the product if they do not receive good answers.
At the third point, the reading mentions that this tactic of advertising can harm social relationships. However, the listening confirms that if the consumers have a really satisfactory experience when using the product, they will become more trustful and believe in other people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ho used the product and really like it. Hence they are able to tell others the truths...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, however, if, really, second, so, still, third, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97422680412 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48539682229 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551546391753 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2026757472 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183993870238 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809538682636 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475510521318 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106332484068 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491445325481 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.