According to the reading passage, it is stated that a silver coin found in North America was placed there recently to mislead the public, and it is a significant evidence of a historical fake. The author developed three reasons to support the idea. However, in the listening part, the professor explains why the assumptions mentioned in the reading part were incorrect and refutes them by describing three reasons as follows.
First, the reading passage claims that since the place where the coin found is so far from its original location, it is mainly imposible to link a connection between the current location and the silver coin. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on this point by describing that native americans were intrested in traveling, and they had traveled far distances. Moreover, they were obssessed with bringing back different objects to there own lands. Accordingly, the reason that far distance contradicts the connection between coin and North America is not acceptable.
Secondly, the reading passage posits that no other coins have been discovered in that canadian sites. In contrast, the lecturar states that Norse people usually did not have a permenant settlement in American site, and whenever they wanted to go back, they packed all of their possessions. In this regard, silver coins were one of the objects that they packed up and took them back to their palce of residence. Thats why there is no other clues of silver coins in Maine region.
Finally, the reading says that native Americans did not recognize silver coins as money, and those coins were useless and redundant objects in North America. The professor opposes this by explaining that although aboriginal people in North America did not value silver coins as money, but the atractive and unusual things worthed them so much. They were transforming those coines to some appealing things like neckless or jwellary. Thus, Eroupian people could have used those coins in trading with Americans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...with bringing back different objects to there own lands. Accordingly, the reason that far...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...econdly, the reading passage posits that no other coins have been discovered in t...
^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... them back to their palce of residence. Thats why there is no other clues of silver c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13538461538 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54289775533 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529230769231 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8020079916 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262660714925 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910081684306 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608933927459 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157992976511 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034429470954 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.