About migration hypothesis

The reading and the lecture are both about the migration hypothesis of the edmontosaur which lived in cold conditions. The author of the reading provided three arguments that support the theory. The lecturer disagrees. He says that these theories are not convincing.
First, the author of the reading passage claims that since the enormous dinosaurs were herbivore animals, they might have moved to other places to obtain food, because plants cannot grow in cold weather. The lecturer, however, disagrees. He believes that these animals did not need to migrate because the warm climate of the north region created great conditions to support plants' growth. He goes on to say that even in the winter, they could have fed on a lot of nutritious dead plants.
Secondly, according to the reading passage, it states that the evidence found from the body remains of the edmontosaur, which was discovered from the same area, supported the idea that these creatures lived in herds. The lecturer rebuts this argument by saying that animals do not only live in groups for only migration but also for other purposes such as seeking protection from predators. On top of that, he mentions that the modern plant-eater animals that dwell in groups do not migrate.
Finally, the reading passage suggests that the edmontosaur were capable of transmuting in long distances since they were agile creatures. The professor says that even though they were able to migrate long distances, the juvenile creatures of the group were not physically capable to follow the herd. So, there is no way they survived on their own.
The author and the lecturer both have conflicting views about the migration theory.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hree arguments that support the theory. The lecturer disagrees. He says that these ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, well, such as, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09747292419 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50627852663 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.1432911571 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167012404519 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575818361123 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112096232809 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12070374696 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100442707705 0.0443174109184 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.