About a project that uses a device to grow more tress, in order to prevent desertification.
The reading states that to stop desertification, the dismissal of the importance of certain projects that helps the trees to grow more quickly, should not be carried, and stated three reasons. The professor disagrees that the reasons for rejecting are not convincing. First of all, the passage explains that in the process of growing many trees, the device cost will be expensive for the entire cost. However, the professor points out that when trees get bigger, the device will be removed. In other words, the device can be reused, thus reducing the cost. Secondly, the author of the reading passage claims that to fight desertification, local people have to participate in the process and their work will be harsh. However, the professor contradicts that being part of the process will benefit local people. They can use the device for other plants and as the tree gets larger, they can use the branches for firewood. Finally, in contrast to the reading passage's point that the tree will not survive because of the device's poor water collection, the professor explains that the tree can survive. Because by growing bigger, the trees will grow long roots and gain moisture from soil underground. He supports this by taking an example of the Sahara desert, which survived a harsh environment after the device was removed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00909090909 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56194334813 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9973139594 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.181818182 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138968978866 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530125021775 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409468575577 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138968978866 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.