airfilters
In this set of material, the reading and listening is both about Air purifiers. The article strongly postulates that airpurifiers are of paramount importance to remove air pollution, and provide three extensively used types of airpurifiers. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that these air purifiers are not as effective as described each has a shortcoming, and gainsays each of them.
First and foremost, the writer begins by asserting that Hepa filters can remove the allergens since they have folded fibre sheeth that can entraps the dust particles and pollens. As a result secondary pollution cannot produce. The lecturer refutes this claim by stating that hepa filters can not ger rid of the extremely smaller particles. He exemplifies that by pollutants particles ,allergens ane viruses who are samller than .03mm, they can easily escape from hepa filter. As a result thet grow and multiply in the air and continue to cause air pollution. Hence, hepa filters are notb effective.
Furthermore, the speaker posits that ozone gnerating air purifiers are dangerous to many extent. To be more specific, if the concentration of ozone is increased to diminish the smell, it would cause serious reaction to the eyes, and also affect the lungs and other body parts of humans. He goes on saying that it affect would be similar to the gasoline which is highly toxic. These claims clearly refutes the writer implication that ozone generating purifiers would be great as they use ozone which produce pleasent smell and purify the air from toxins.
Ultimately, the writers wraps up its argument by declaring that UV purifiers have the benefit that they kill the bacterial production and clean the environment without producing much noise. Not surprisingly, the speaker takes an issue with that by contending that uv filters can not clear away the dust and other harmful molecules. For instance, cigarettes smoke and other gasses would still not be cleared away. Consequently, their puprpose of removing basic dust particles from air would not be fulfilled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...entraps the dust particles and pollens. As a result secondary pollution cannot pro...
^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...exemplifies that by pollutants particles ,allergens ane viruses who are samller th...
^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...utants particles ,allergens ane viruses who are samller than .03mm, they can easily esc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun extent seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much extent', 'a good deal of extent'.
Suggestion: much extent; a good deal of extent
...nerating air purifiers are dangerous to many extent. To be more specific, if the concentrat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, still, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18318318318 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70685700076 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573573573574 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4373015448 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.529411765 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.