Altruism and altruism acts....
The passage discusses about altruism in which an animals and human sacrifices their interests for other another beings. It gives a description of altruism as an opposite of selfishness. However, the professor talks about the same topic with a different perspective that from the passage.
First, the passage provides an example of Meerkat, a mammal, which sacrifices itself for the sake of the whole group. In fact, while all the other meerkats are engaged in feeding, he is the one that guards and informs in case of any predator. However, the professor suggests that the guard meerkat is the one that generally eat the food ahead from that of the herd or group and has the least threat from the predators like hawk as he us always close to the borrow.
Secondly, the passage suggests that meerkat have to warn the others by making various sounds that makes it vulnerable to predator. On the other hand, the professor argues that such activities would rather protect the guard meerkat from potential danger as it creates an alarming effect on the hawk.
Finally, the passage suggests that human beings have shown immense altruism by various unselfish acts like donation or organs to family members, and even to strangers. Such acts are done without any rewards or incentives. However, the professor argues that such acts also have its own personal incentives, especially non-materialistic ones. Moreover, the donor always has a strong feeling of self-worth and dignity in the society due to his deeds. In other words, people and animals can perform various activities that seem to be altruistic but rather has some hidden incentives in it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tors like hawk as he us always close to the borrow. Secondly, the passage suggests th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60599477958 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556776556777 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8642494811 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.615384615 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0922298579926 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412502204256 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789837270049 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641425182788 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791970925486 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.