Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently
The reading passage reports the finding of an animal tissue on a T.rex fossil. The professor is skeptical about finding tissue on such an old fossil. Specifically, three findings have reported which the professor refutes each finding.
First, the professor states that the remainder of the blood vessels and red blood cells in the leg bone can not belong to a dinosaur. He explains that there are certain bacterias that can live in the bone and their residue are mistaken of blood vessels and blood cells.
Second, the reading posits that there are soft flexible organic substances inside bones' channels that are remains of blood vessels of a T.rex. But the professor reminds of the other fossils found in the vicinity of excavation site which have no sign of such substances.
Third, the report says that they have found Collagen in dinosaur leg bone. The professor refutes this claim and explains that Collagen has never found in fossils with an age more than 100 years old. He also mentions that the Collagen scientists founded can be of the skin of the scientists themselves which contains Collagen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sue on such an old fossil. Specifically, three findings have reported which the p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 186.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99462365591 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41165441204 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.198529372 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.9 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109691011061 0.272083759551 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516750414318 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558280352168 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659624015308 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049358678168 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.