The author states about he reasons of sending people to an asteroid to form a colonization is the best option. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that the low gravity is a good factor that would made it possible for spaceships to land on asteroid. When gravity is lower the craft wouldn't pull as strongly, so, the landing would be safe. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that the low gravity present risks too. For example, the people who travel on space have health problems such as, lose of muscles mass. Moreover, this is not good practice.
The second argument the author gives is that Mining valuable metals would make people to earn a lot of precious metals. Since, asteroids are rich on these valuable elements, people can profit from them. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that to transport all these precious metals is very costive and people cannot guaranty the price. Furthermore, the price may be lower that they may think.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that it is easy to reach on the asteroid because they come near Earth's surface, so, would be easier and affordable to get to, compare to other planets. Nevertheless, the lecturer declaring that it is not easy to return back because some paths come close not all of them, so, it would be challenging to travel such a long distance.
Although, the text suggests these three reasons supporting the creation of colonies on asteroid, The professor believe that none of them are persuasive.
.
The author states about he reasons of sending people to an asteroid to form a colonization is the best option. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that the low gravity is a good factor that would made it possible for spaceships to land on asteroid. When gravity is lower the craft wouldn't pull as strongly, so, the landing would be safe. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that the low gravity present risks too. For example, the people who travel on space have health problems such as, lose of muscles mass. Moreover, this is not good practice.
The second argument the author gives is that Mining valuable metals would make people to earn a lot of precious metals. Since, asteroids are rich on these valuable elements, people can profit from them. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that to transport all these precious metals is very costive and people cannot guaranty the price. Furthermore, the price may be lower that they may think.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that it is easy to reach on the asteroid because they come near Earth's surface, so, would be easier and affordable to get to, compare to other planets. Nevertheless, the lecturer declaring that it is not easy to return back because some paths come close not all of them, so, it would be challenging to travel such a long distance.
Although, the text suggests these three reasons supporting the creation of colonies on asteroid, The professor believe that none of them are persuasive.
.
- The author states about he reasons of sending people to an asteroid to form a colonization is the best option. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremost 73
- TPO 19 Integrated writing task 33
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant For instance humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37 C no matter whether the environment is warm or cold Because dinosaurs were rep 92
- Word Count：299总耗时:27m35s 查看题目讨论The author states about the three kinds of damages caused by the " let it burn" policy. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter- argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these damages do not seem convin 70
- TPO. 24-integrated writing task
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...teroid. When gravity is lower the craft wouldnt pull as strongly, so, the landing would...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...cturer declaring that it is not easy to return back because some paths come close not all o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'traveling', 'travelling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: traveling; travelling
...ll of them, so, it would be challenging to travel such a long distance. Although, the te...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 153, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lieve that none of them are persuasive. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, lastly, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, for example, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98566308244 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53123094601 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2933161642 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376621819658 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124860096496 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192208195355 0.0662205650399 290% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256295434941 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.343191446666 0.0443174109184 774% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.