The author states about the reasons that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that when Austen died her family gave the permission to use the portrait as an illustration in an edition of her letters. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that in that portrait is not Austen because she was elder than 17 years when she died. Apart from that, the girl in the portrait does not correspond with the age of the Austen.
The second argument the author gives is that the face in the portrait clearly resembles the Cassandra's sketch, which communicate definite details about Austen's face. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that the Austen's family was a big family the possibility of given one of the portraits of her cousins is high. Actually, the family could have given her nice portrait instead.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that the painter who painted the portrait was linked with Ozias style. Even though, the signature was missing. The family would hire one of the most famous painter. Nevertheless, the professor declaring that only because was his style it does not prove that is painted by him. Additionally, the seller of the portrait start selling when Austen was 27 years old at that time. So, the timing did not correspond with the age of the girl in the picture.
Although, the text suggests three reasons in supporting the Austen portrait, the lecturer believes that none of them are persuasive..
.
The author states about the reasons that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that when Austen died her family gave the permission to use the portrait as an illustration in an edition of her letters. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that in that portrait is not Austen because she was elder than 17 years when she died. Apart from that, the girl in the portrait does not correspond with the age of the Austen.
The second argument the author gives is that the face in the portrait clearly resembles the Cassandra's sketch, which communicate definite details about Austen's face. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that the Austen's family was a big family the possibility of given one of the portraits of her cousins is high. Actually, the family could have given her nice portrait instead.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that the painter who painted the portrait was linked with Ozias style. Even though, the signature was missing. The family would hire one of the most famous painter. Nevertheless, the professor declaring that only because was his style it does not prove that is painted by him. Additionally, the seller of the portrait start selling when Austen was 27 years old at that time. So, the timing did not correspond with the age of the girl in the picture.
Although, the text suggests three reasons in supporting the Austen portrait, the lecturer believes that none of them are persuasive..
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As o...
^^
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...elieves that none of them are persuasive.. .
^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eves that none of them are persuasive.. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, lastly, nevertheless, second, so, apart from, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00354609929 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52844571733 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6862136712 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393290191411 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13233060252 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183938106949 0.0662205650399 278% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284379013035 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.328762521027 0.0443174109184 742% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.