Task 1
Both the lecture and the article are about the advantages and drawbacks of using box-shaped devices to solve desertification dilemma. While the article states that these devices are unlikely to be helpful in the plant growing process, the lecturer disputes the claims mentioned in the article. She stated that the arguments in the article are not convincing.
To begin with, the article points out that installing and maintaining box-shaped devices around trees is expensive process and required millions of dollars annually. According to the article, many countries cannot afford this method. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that the cost of the device is reasonable. She explains that devices can be removed after trees grow and reused on other trees for twenty times.
Secondly. the article suggests that people who live in these areas are not motivated enough to look after devices. The article notes that those people have to work hard to provide food for their families. The lecturer, on the other hand, asserts that rewarding those people is a possible way to motivate them. She goes on to say that there are two methods can be done so people will be enthusiasm to assist in this process, first allow them use devices for their own vegetables, and they can use the branches of big trees for fire.
Finally, the author puts forth the idea that after removing the devices, big trees are not capable to handle the harsh conditions. In contrast, the lecturer claims that devices help trees to grow long roots, which can easily reach the underground water. She says that trees in Sahara still thriving even after two years of removing devices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Task 1 Both the lecture and the article are abo...
^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ther trees for twenty times. Secondly. the article suggests that people who live i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99288256228 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44911745633 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551601423488 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2276492541 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0878578333159 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310523652919 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305748701755 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548987996671 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258085615569 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.