Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the environment and suggest that the United States government should create new, much stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash.
The article states that in the united states, the representatives of power companies believe that the newly imposed roles are unconvincing and might actually have adverse effects and provide three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that the new roles should be much stricter than it was in the past, and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that there was the useful and practical regulation in advance; they illustrated the requirements of using the linear method and specific material to prevent the contaminating of the environment. the professor refutes this points by stating that the old field factory and the farm does not utilize
this material, whereby to avoid contaminating the surrounding environment, all farms such as the new and old firm should be respectful to regulation, being effective regulation notwithstanding, it is not really sufficient.
Second, the article claims that consumers may become concerned that recycled coal ash products are just too dangerous and may stop buying the products by the new rules and concerning the issue thereof. However, the professor contends that recycling rules do not necessarily mean the coal ashes are dangerous; some other material such as faced strict long-term rules, but it has no negative effect on consumer buying this material.
Third, the reading avers that strict new regulations would result in a significant increase( ten times the current costs) in disposal and handling costs for the power companies. The professor opposes this point by saying that it is true that the costs will increase, but it is well worth it; it almost cost 50 billion dollars to companies; if they do the math, they would realize that it is one percent of consumer electricity bills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Vivian Chang | 3 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Zmx_6 | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | tststs | 3 | view |
- The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron A 3
- Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 3
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 80
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice 3
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...t the contaminating of the environment. the professor refutes this points by statin...
^^^
Line 10, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ant increase ten times the current costs in disposal and handling costs for the p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, third, well, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7973649827 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59298245614 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2585358745 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.625 110.228320801 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.625 21.698381199 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14854586617 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615402556781 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513937304219 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730595661889 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576585447343 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.3589403974 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 11.0289183223 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.