Lecture and reading discusses about substituting internal combustion engine with hydrogen based fuel cell engine. Reading talks about positive outcomes of using hydrogen based cell, while prefecture states that benefits of hydrogen based cell over internal combustion engine in reading are not logical.
First, reading states that petroleum is non-renewable source of energy, so in near future petroleum can no longer reproduced. Reading adds that hydrogen is easily available in the atmosphere in infinite quantity. Lecture casts doubt on this statement. She thinks that indeed hydrogen is always available in water, but can’t be used without processing. She thinks production of liquid hydrogen is very complicated and expensive process.
Second, reading points out that combustion of petroleum may contaminate environment. Furthermore, hydrogen based cell do not produce carbon dioxde. In contrast, lecture says that the process to obtain hydrogen in liquid form necessitates burning of coal and oil. She states that hydrogen cell might not reduce pollution because the factories to convert hydrogen emit smoke and harmful gases.
Third, reading implies that switching to hydrogen cell is cheaper option over internal combustion engine, as hydrogen cell is very efficient in producing energy. On contrary, lecture points out that platinum is used to form liquid hydrogen and its very expensive. However, other cheaper material failed to produce hydrogen. As a result she thinks that it is not economically feasible option. She successfully casts doubt on statements made in reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er material failed to produce hydrogen. As a result she thinks that it is not econ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, may, second, so, third, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72268907563 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75195650401 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4764538387 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.125 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.875 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172075700404 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058494249368 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615835419443 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116311321102 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492830490395 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 53.8541721854 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.3 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.