The reading states that fuel-cell engines that use hydrogen are an alternative source for internal combustion engines and provide three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it is true that petroleum is finite but hydrogen is not a good replacement for current fuel sources and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article claims that petroleum is finite. The professor opposes this point by saying that although the petroleum is not renewable and will be finished but replacing hydrogen instead of current fuels is not feasible because it is not easily usable as a fuel. He also explains that it is clear that hydrogen is an available source but it cannot be easily usable and performing hydrogen to be used in cars as a source of energy need a difficult technology to obtain it as a pure liquid.
Second, the reading avers that using hydrogen is beneficial because it will solve the pollution problem. However, the professor contends that producing hydrogen produce lots of pollutant. According to professor to produce hydrogen a lot of coil and oil have to be burnt and the factories that produce hydrogen will bring lots of pollutant to the environment .So, it will not solve the pollution problem.
Third, the article posits that using hydrogen as a source of energy for cars need less money and it is more efficient. The professor opposes this point by explaining that obtaining hydrogen needs lots of platinium which is really expensive. We also learn that manifactoring hydrogen is an expensive process and it will not help people to save
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that it is true that petroleum is finite but hydrogen is not a good replacement f...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pollutant seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of pollutants'.
Suggestion: lots of pollutants
...ontends that producing hydrogen produce lots of pollutant. According to professor to produce hydr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun coil seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of coils'.
Suggestion: a lot of coils
...ording to professor to produce hydrogen a lot of coil and oil have to be burnt and the factor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pollutant seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of pollutants'.
Suggestion: lots of pollutants
...tories that produce hydrogen will bring lots of pollutant to the environment .So, it will not sol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ing lots of pollutant to the environment .So, it will not solve the pollution prob...
^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...g lots of pollutant to the environment .So, it will not solve the pollution proble...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256227758007 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.192170818505 0.158904122519 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0782918149466 0.0723426182421 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0569395017794 0.0435111971325 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0391459074733 0.0277247811725 141% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120996441281 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0427046263345 0.0370669169778 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6562484808 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0249110320285 0.0208969081088 119% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0960854092527 0.128158765124 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0213523131673 0.0158828679856 134% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106761565836 0.0114777025283 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1586.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 264.0 271.125827815 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00757575758 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397727272727 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318181818182 0.287516216867 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223484848485 0.187439937562 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128787878788 0.113142543107 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6562484808 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473484848485 0.539623497131 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.3155833984 53.8517498576 82% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3693545486 49.3711431718 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.181818182 132.220823453 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 55.8181818182 50.5018328374 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.45679012346 1.90840788429 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345057788561 0.549887131256 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.168203780998 0.142949733639 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0864775431083 0.0787303798458 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.658154524634 0.631733273073 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130246025922 0.139662658121 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18549324535 0.266732575781 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675121440735 0.103435571967 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.411627762986 0.414875509568 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0262419822664 0.0530846634433 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264122425821 0.40443939384 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453551202793 0.0528353158467 86% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.