the cause of decline of literature books
The reading and the lecture are both about the decline of literature reading. Whereas the author of the reading states that this decline effects the comunity, the lecturer suggests that there are other than literature in modern days instead of litreture. The lecutrer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, literature is the only thing to provide intellectual stimulation. However, the lecturer disputea this point. She says that in these days there are other things that can provide intellectual stimulation. Furthermore, she mentions that history, scince books that can increase of immagination and increase our knowldege of the launguge used in these books.
Secondly, the article states that the readers tend to read less benificial books. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that in each era there is something replaces other. She points out in these days the television and music video or read a web can provide us with the same benifits literature books provide us.
Finally, although the article and the lecture agrees on the lack of these kin of books. But the reading claims that this problem is caused by the publishers. On the other hand, the lecturer belive that it is from the writers. She thinks that the modern writers made there books harder to understand even if the readers from the past finds it hard to read.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07983193277 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56421311499 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516806722689 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3646297393 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8666666667 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189298592521 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562526127789 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070875154749 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10828498924 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416178322792 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.