The cave paintings of Lascaux (in southwestern France) date to around 15,000 B.C.E. and are among the finest examples of prehistoric art known.
There are paintings in the Lascoux caves that have caused a discussion among scientists. The passage provides three reasons why the paintings were drawn so that they cause successful hunt for the people. The lecturer, on the hand, challenges these talking points.
Firstly, the passage suggests that the depiction of large mamals in the paintings proves they were for ensuring successful hunts. That is due to the fact that these large mamals were hunted by prehistoric people. This view is opposed by the lecturer by claiming that there is not enough support for this. For instance, there are paintings of cats in the cave and raindeers which were one of the most common preys are not present in the paintings.
Secondly, the paintings where hunters were shown with animal heads is a representation of a tradition where hunters used to put the animal heads to decieve the preys. This argument is disagreed about by the lecturer as well. According to him, the hunters in the paintings are majorly depicted in horizontal forms showing that they were sleeping rather than hunting where the hunter should stand up during the process.
Thirdly, the depiction of animals for magical purposes has been proposed by the text. The text suggests that people use these paintings for the magical effects that they might have in increasing their luck in hunting rather than mere decorative representations. The professor opposes this point by proposing that in some cultures, people used this depictions for certain ceremonies. In these ceremonies, they used these paintings to communicate with the spirit of their ancestors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sing that in some cultures, people used this depictions for certain ceremonies. In t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16730038023 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62490735949 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528517110266 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6483174841 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0714285714 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809452154729 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338266164853 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414656773689 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573157205785 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297525792672 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.