certify wood companies
The reading and the lecture are both about certifying wood. Whereas the author of the reading states that many companies would not certify their wood for several reason, the lecturer suggests that certified wood will help wood companies. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the article, many consumer loss trusts on advertising so even if the company says that their wood is certified they will not buy it. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that American consumer will trust any independent agency. Furthermore, he mentions that consumer will be convinced if the advertised product is certified.
Secondly, the passage states that the value of the wood would be higher than uncertified ones by that the consumer will not buy it. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. He argues that value is not the first thing American consumer sees. In addition, he points out that consumer think about the value if the price difference in much higher in fact if the difference is low, they tend to buy the expensive.
Finally, the reading claims that the wood company certify their wood will not make sense unless the company is planning to sell in foreign countries. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that it is not true. He thinks that the company should think about the competition and the future. Moreover, he feels that foreign companies might come to USA and destroy the companies who have not certify their wood yet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...panies would not certify their wood for several reason the lecturer suggests that certified wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the reading by providing three reasons First of all according to the article ma...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d if the advertised product is certified Secondly the passage states that the val...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce is low they tend to buy the expensive Finally the reading claims that the wood...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... low they tend to buy the expensive Finally the reading claims that the wood compan...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'certified'.
Suggestion: certified
... and destroy the companies who have not certify their wood yet
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87937743191 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36363948698 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474708171206 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 257.0 21.2450331126 1210% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1254.0 110.228320801 1138% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 257.0 21.698381199 1184% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 150.0 7.06452816374 2123% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464646142306 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.464646142306 0.0996497079465 466% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313942937777 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199273635393 0.0443174109184 450% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 130.1 13.3589403974 974% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -180.92 53.8541721854 -336% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 102.3 11.0289183223 928% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.5 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.03 8.42419426049 226% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 10.7273730684 503% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 104.8 10.498013245 998% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.