The reading and lecture discussed about Chevalier's memoir which was written about his life. However, both of them has presented contrasting claims. In order to support the statements made in the reading, the author has mentioned three reasons and these three main reasons have been undermined by the speaker.
Firstly, the writer of the reading asserted that Chevalier was not rich as he took loan from the merchant. the speaker rebuts the claim by claiming that It doesn't mean that Chevalier was not rich , sometimes person has to wait for the money and till that time one can burrow money from someone.
Secondly, the author contended that the Chevalier could not remember exact details of the meeting with Voltaire. The lecturer, on the other hand, maintains that Chevalier takes reference from the notes that he prepare on the same night when he had a conversation with Voltaire and consulted at the time of writing in his memoir and hence Chevalier are reliable.
lastly, the author posits that Chevalier might have bribed the jailor in order to escape from the prison as Chevalier had many connections with the powerful people. however, the women in her speech claims that there were other prisoners who also had good connection but still they were not able to escape and in addition to this there are records that the Jail has to repair the ceiling of the Chevalier' locker.
In conclusion, the reading presented three major claims to undermine the Chevalier's memoir but lecture rebuked every claim made by the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... undermined by the speaker. Firstly, the writer of the reading asserted that ...
^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...rich as he took loan from the merchant. the speaker rebuts the claim by claiming th...
^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...er rebuts the claim by claiming that It doesnt mean that Chevalier was not rich , some...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... doesnt mean that Chevalier was not rich , sometimes person has to wait for the mo...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...ir and hence Chevalier are reliable. lastly, the author posits that Chevalier might...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...y connections with the powerful people. however, the women in her speech claims that th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, as to, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40078136332 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55078125 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2773589335 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 7.06452816374 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175336018586 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746284656321 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442061570022 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993252599187 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334988811237 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.