The article and lecture discussed the emperor Claudius of Rome. The reading suggested positive sides of the Claudius and gave a few instances to support the claims. However, the lecturer, on the other hand, depicted the negative side of the Claudius by challenging the article's claim with supporting details.
firstly, The reading asserted that Claudius was an innovative leader as he took over the island of Britain and combined them, he built several other projects to assist his empire. however, the lecturer agrees with the statement but also he contributed negatively to society by paying the army, which was dangerous.
Secondly, the article posits that he conquered the island of Britain and merged them for Rome, but the lecturer averted that Claudis liked destruction and violence as he conquered the islands of Britain just to destroy the inhabitants and for his amusements.
Finally, the article suggested that he made rights for slaves and included them in a bureaucratic framework where slaves worked efficiently for all future emperor including his wives. But the author challenged the article's claims by stating about
his selected people(slaves) that they were corrupt and has been involved in taking money from people. Moreover, the lecturer mentioned about the wife of Claudius that one of them was a muderer and the last wife poisoned him and also his son, which became the emperor later was one of the worst ruler of the rome.
In conclusion, the article made a certain claims about Claudius and depicted him as a great emperor but the lecture has challenged those claims effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...icles claim with supporting details. firstly, The reading asserted that Claudius was...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...al other projects to assist his empire. however, the lecturer agrees with the statement...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19157088123 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62326507407 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.943141992 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151869177823 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689609175494 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508148754172 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795993916736 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358401157571 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.