Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
Science and technology have been evolving and dominant field since their inception.No doubt both the fields have solved numerous problems in every field and still both the fields are promising, but lets take a deeper dive into the argument by considering some instances.
Science and techology both are solving problems by novel approaches.Humans used science and technology and created social networking site to solve the communication issues,however the solution took other problems with itself like stalking,hacking etc. Similarly, Humans created explosives to mine valuable resouces, but this solution itself became a problem, when humans started using it for killing and dominating other humans.Hence, the nature of problems is never ending.
While problems increasing, Science and technology has solved major problems like reaching to your home quickly by transportation, calling , video calling etc but when you look closly you will find that they have contributed to problems too.
In conclusion, Science and technology has solved problems but have also contributed other problems too, due to which I have to take a stand for the conclusion that Science and technology will not one day be able to solve all society's problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: No
...nd dominant field since their inception.No doubt both the fields have solved numer...
^^
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...n every field and still both the fields are promising, but lets take a deeper dive into the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...till both the fields are promising, but lets take a deeper dive into the argument by...
^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Humans
...re solving problems by novel approaches.Humans used science and technology and created...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...g site to solve the communication issues,however the solution took other problems with i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hacking
...other problems with itself like stalking,hacking etc. Similarly, Humans created explosiv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...for killing and dominating other humans.Hence, the nature of problems is never ending...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to your home quickly by transportation, calling , video calling etc but when you...
^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...home quickly by transportation, calling , video calling etc but when you look clo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, look, similarly, so, still, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 58.6224719101 32% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 2235.4752809 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 189.0 442.535393258 43% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62962962963 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 4.55969084622 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03433719551 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 215.323595506 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613756613757 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 704.065955056 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.2370786517 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 15.5871742147 60.3974514979 26% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 212.8 118.986275619 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.8 23.4991977007 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.0 5.21951772744 326% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175797757857 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101985408152 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858246533679 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120350212537 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829996120193 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 14.1392134831 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.46 48.8420337079 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.97 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.8971910112 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.