clay
The reading and lecture are both about whether the vessels which founded in Iraq by villagers are an electric battery or not. The passage presents three explanations to posit why it is not a convenience argue that if add some liquid this vessels can work as a battery. The professor, however, refutes all of those explanations.
To begin with, the author of the reading claims that archeologists are not finding any evidence of existing wires or conductors adjacent to vessels, so it is not make an electricity. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this claim by mentioning that the lack of presence of ant wires or conductors, it is not firm evidence to deny a whole battery. Maybe because local people excavate a battery in order to excavate by archeologist, wires are ignored. Also, villagers throw away this wires or break them.
Secondly, the substance simultaneously find in a Seleucia, and Seleucia's people utilize this clay as a hold scroll. Consequently, it is not a battery. However, the professor maintains an opposite opinion that this similarity do not prove anything. Also, people after utilizing this clay, understanding that if put some liquid and add metal, they can make electricity. Therefore, they use electricity as a final goal.
Third, the reading states that ancient people do not need electricity and it is useless. The professor, however, cast doubt on this claim by stating that people of those times believe on magic, so perhaps use this electricity as a particular vigorous and power or apply electricity for healing. Now doctors and surgeon use the shock that made by electricity as goal to cure sick people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nvenience argue that if add some liquid this vessels can work as a battery. The prof...
^^^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...uid this vessels can work as a battery. The professor, however, refutes all of thos...
^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...site opinion that this similarity do not prove anything. Also, people after utili...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11070110701 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.935154721 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549815498155 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3617847295 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0720549328845 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249526753054 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636607816001 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0455403252235 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788781570802 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.