buzzer
The reading and lecture are both about the idea of using buzzer in the advertisement plan of different companies. The reading passage presents three explanations to posit why using buzzer is a controversial act for the consumer and criticize this phenomenon. However, the buzzer is invited to the marketing class by the professor and refutes all of those explanations. People think the wrong way about us and involve misleading.
To begin with, the author of reading claims that consumers should know about buzzer. Buzzer obtains money in this way, so it is not fair people believe their words, and they do not know their act as a fake consumer. Nevertheless, the buzzer refutes the notion and mentioning that buzzers do not tell they lie, and they say what they think is right. Moreover, companies choose buzzer through the people who are believing the quality of products, so they are not actors.
Secondly, the article posits that if people know about the buzzer, they are less believing in them and criticizing them. On the other hand, the buzzer maintains an opposite opinion that people are not hearing and believing the buzzer's idea, however, they ask a plethora questions about the price and services and so on and if the buzzer does not address the concern, they will not purchase merchandise.
Thirdly, the reading passage states that buzzers spread mistruth and dishonest between people. However, the buzzers cast doubt on this claim by stating that buzzers are not destroying civilization since we say the right things about products, and whenever people try their shopping, they understand the products are qualified and again buy it
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...es choose buzzer through the people who are believing the quality of products, so they are no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...intains an opposite opinion that people are not hearing and believing the buzzers idea, however...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buzzers'' or 'buzzer's'?
Suggestion: buzzers'; buzzer's
...eople are not hearing and believing the buzzers idea, however, they ask a plethora ques...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11029411765 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59911649881 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533088235294 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6860329951 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47686291977 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215643712568 0.0996497079465 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856558546474 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338631153488 0.162205337803 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028984920375 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.