The communal online encyclopedia has several problems that make them much less valuable than traditional printed encycloedia
The article states that the communal online encyclopedias have several important problems that make them much less valuable than traditional, printed encyclopedias and provides three reasons for support. However, The professor explains that this is not true and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that contributors to a communal online encyclopedia often lack academic credentials. The professor refutes this point by saying this that online encyclopedia have errors hardly and we can see a error even in offline mode. actually, we can see that traditionally printed errors which remain for decades.
Secondly, the article avers that even is an original entry in an online encyclopedia is correct, the communal nature of these online encyclopedias gives unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers the opportunity to fabricate, delete, and corrupt information. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that they use a strategy for some argued information that has a constant format which no one can change it, and also they have specialists that eliminate the incorrect and unnecessary information and material.
Thirdly, the reading posits that the communal encyclopedias focus too frequently, and in too great depth, however, the professor opposes this point by saying that despite the fact that they have limited space, space is not an issue and the online encyclopedias can demonstrate a great variety and diversity of information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opposes each of the authors reasons. First of all, the reading claims that co...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...pedia have errors hardly and we can see a error even in offline mode. actually, w...
^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Actually
...e can see a error even in offline mode. actually, we can see that traditionally printed ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted errors which remain for decades. Secondly, the article avers that even is...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnecessary information and material. Thirdly, the reading posits that the com...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5350877193 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97130267415 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535087719298 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.9430610593 49.2860985944 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.75 110.228320801 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296539922496 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132789273239 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165793970583 0.0662205650399 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193616896204 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148977452272 0.0443174109184 336% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 53.8541721854 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.