communal online encyclopedias

Essay topics:

communal online encyclopedias

The reading states that the communal online encyclopedias has various important problems that could make it less valuable than traditional encyclopedia. However, The speaker disagrees with the statement and refutes all the reasons mention in the passage

First, The reading claims that the articles in encyclopedia are sometimes inacurate due to lack of academic credentials of the contributors. The speaker denies this point by saying that none of the article is totally error free. he states that errors are also present in traditional encyclopedias. Comprehensive and complex articles are consists of errors as well

Second, The reading posits that the encyclopedias can be hacked and modified by hackers. speaker opposes this point by saying that it is protected by malicious hackers. he states that the articles are in read only format so it cannot be modified by people and a person is assigned whose job is to analyse the changes done in encyclopedia.

Third, The article claims that many topics in communal encyclopedias creates false impression of what is important and what is not. The speaker refutes the point by saying that encyclopedia has limited space. he states that intrested people decides whether what is important in the article. Their is not an issue of space and within the encyclopedia, one can read variety of articles.

To sum up, The Author and speaker holds conflicting views on the communal online encyclopedia. hence, it is hard to find common ground for the given topic.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...e of the article is totally error free. he states that errors are also present in ...
^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Speaker
... can be hacked and modified by hackers. speaker opposes this point by saying that it is...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...t it is protected by malicious hackers. he states that the articles are in read on...
^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ng that encyclopedia has limited space. he states that intrested people decides wh...
^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
...ether what is important in the article. Their is not an issue of space and within the...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...ws on the communal online encyclopedia. hence, it is hard to find common ground for t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, well, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21399176955 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89416586266 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530864197531 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7779712756 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4615384615 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322205804811 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11509808304 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145473630043 0.0662205650399 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195894564989 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112264047104 0.0443174109184 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.