The article states that communal online encycolpedias have many crucial problems that make them less valuable than traditional, printed encyclopedia. To support the idea the passage provides some reasons. However, the lecture casts doubt on the points and explains that although probably they have never been perfect but there are worthful for the low price we pay them.
First, the author claims that the contributors to the communal online encyclopedia lack of academic credential. However, the professor asserts that the printed encycolpeidas never been close to perfect. Also, it is not easy to find a reference book as traditional book or printed. This means that the online encycolpeidas provide so much information.
Second, the passage poists that the hackers have access to the online encycopeidas and they can fabricate them whenever they want. However, the professor asserts that the adminstartors of the online encycopedias understand the importance of the informaion. This means that they present them in some particular formats that anyone cannot change them. Therefore, the contents are reliable and the responsibles check every information added to the encycolpedias, so they easily recognize the malicious contents and eliminate them.
Third, the passages demonstrates that the focus of the online encycolpedias are so frequently and on too great depth and popular topic which creates a false impression of the importance of the topics. However, the lecturer oppose to the claim and adds online encyclopeidas have unlimited spaces and therefore they check the importance of the contents. This can not be an issue then. Also, they have academic reviews and they see what is great for users. Therefore, this is the strongest advantage of the encyclopeidas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tors to the communal online encyclopedia lack of academic credential. However, th...
^^
Line 4, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an issue then. Also, they have academic reviews and they see what is great for u...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, then, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43272727273 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93850133276 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1920527605 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.375 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200093851019 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062948327627 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583961483857 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124125095375 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237940065118 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.