declining in the number of frog species around the world, find ways to solve it.
Both the reading and the lecture talk about declining in the number of frog species around the world. The article provides three possible solutions to get rid of such a huge decreasing in frogs population, however all of them were unpractical in the professor's eyes. Accordingly, she denies all of them with some explanation.
First and foremost, according to the writer of the excerpt, pesticides used by farmers in order to kill threaten insects for their crops play an important role in the declining of frogs' number. Considering this outcome of pesticides, they must become illegal to use in the neighborhood of frog habitats. Nevertheless, the professor in the lecture sees such a solution as an uneconomic and unfair one. She refers to harms arose from prohibition of pesticides for farmers. Farmers with such a farmland will obtain excess limitation in comparison to the rest of them, so they will have some disadvantages. They will not be able to compete with their counterparts.
Secondly, the writer of the article claims that a fungus is one of the major reasons to cause the very decrease. Scientists have to treat frogs from this infection. Nonetheless, the professor in the lecture rejects such a notion by mentioning to problems of it. Treatment must be done in a large scale, since not only do all frogs have to catch to treat directly, but also such a treatment can not be beneficial for the next generations; in fact, every new young frog must treat in the same way. In this regard, the aforementioned solution is complicated and expensive.
The author of the reading lasting insists that protecting the natural habitats of frogs, wetland and water habitats, result in preventing frogs population declining. However, the professor in the lecture refutes this solution too by saying that human activities do not a significant effect on habitats of frogs. She maintains that global warming is the root of threatening frogs habitats. In her viewpoint, if wetlands and water habitats were been not allowed to excessive use and development, it would not change anything about frogs habitats because global warming impact is unlikely to stop.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, in fact, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 30.3222958057 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06179775281 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88023139036 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2345149339 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178082563074 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522357183393 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916064777176 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106759362941 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627862692113 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.